Integrated geophysical assessment of a municipal waste disposal site for its geological suitability in terms of the underlain material

Authors

  • Omolara A. Adenuga Department of Physics, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, PMB 2002, Nigeria
  • Olateju A. Bayewu Department of Earth Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, PMB 2002, Nigeria
  • Hamid T. Oladunjoye Department of Physics, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, PMB 2002, Nigeria
  • Sofiat A. Adekoya Department of Physics, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, PMB 2002, Nigeria

Keywords:

Leachate, Pollution, Geophysical methods, Clay overburden, Dumpsite

Abstract

Dumpsites are major sources of groundwater pollution as a result of leachates that drain out of the decomposed waste. If there are no underlain materials that could serve as a seal to stop the percolation of leachate, it finds its way to the groundwater. A properly designed landfill is expected to have a high leachate curtailment capacity to limit groundwater pollution. A suitable landfill is expected to have a specific thickness of clay which acts as a natural filter. This study aims to determine the subsurface material and the leachate curtailment of Oke–Diya dumpsites. Very low frequency-electromagnetic method was adopted as a reconnaissance survey, after which electrical resistivity and multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) methods were carried out. The resistivity values obtained were used to determine the lithological units of the study area while the MASW was employed to determine the seismic wave arrival times which was processed to obtain the shear wave velocities of the subsurface. The rigidity moduli were also obtained from the shear wave velocities, from which the lithological units of the subsurface were inferred. The integrated method appeared to be the ideal tool to characterize the dumpsite and adjudge the leachate curtailment capacity. The methods corroborated each other. Oke-Diya dumpsite, from the results, revealed the study area had low leachate curtailment capacity and should be evacuated.

Dimensions

B. R. Babu, A. K. Parande & C. A. Basha, “Electrical and electronic waste: A global environmental problem”, Waste Management & Research 25 (2007) 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07076941

O. A. Adenuga & O. I. Popoola, “Subsurface characterization using electrical and MASW techniques for suitable municipal solid waste disposal site”, SN Applied Sciences 21 (2020) 549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s4252-020-03320-x

S. Mor, K. Ravindra, R. P. Dahiya & A. Chandra, “Leachate characterization and assessment of groundwater pollution near municipal solid waste landfill site”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 118 (2006) 435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-1505-7

M. B. Aminu, T. M. Akande & O. A. Ishola, “2D geoelectric imaging of the Uneme - Nekhua fracture zone”, International Journal of Geophysics 4 (2014) 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/842812

E. Adar & M. S. Bilgili, “The performance of four different mineral liners on the transportation of chlorinated phenolic compounds to groundwater in landfills”, Sci. World. J. 2015 (2015) 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/171284

Geological Survey of Ireland. Hydrogeological criteria recommended approach to site selection, 2005. http://www.gsi.ie/mapping

S. F. Thornton, M. I. Bright, D. N. Lerner & J. H. Tellam, “Attenuation of landfill leachate by UK Triassic sandstone aquifer materials sorption and degradation of organic pollutants in laboratory columns”, J. Contam. Hydrol. 43 (2000) 355. https://doi:10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00106-0

K. D. Pennell, J. Costanza, L. Kong, E. Suchomel & C. A. Ramsburg, “Ground water quality”, Water Environment Research 73 (2002) 1239. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2175/106143002X140693

A. K. Benson, K. L. Payne & M. A. Stubben, “Mapping groundwater contamination using dc resistivity and VLF geophysical methods–A case study”, Geophysics 62 (1997) 80. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444148

W. M. Telford, L. P. Geldart & R. E. Sheriff, Applied geophysics, 2nd Edition, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167932

T. Dahlin & M. H. Loke, “Resolution of 2D Wenner resistivity imaging as assessed by numerical modelling”, J Appl. Geophys. 38 (1998) 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00030-X

E. Lanz, L. Jemmi, R. Muller, A. Green, A. Pugin & P. Huggenberger, “Integrated studies of Swiss waste disposal sites: results from georadar and other geophysical surveys”, In: The 5th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR ‘94). Kitchener, Ontario (1994)1261. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.300.95

A. Gazoty, G. Fiandaca, J. Pedersen, E. Auken & A. V. Christiansen, “Data repeatability and acquisition techniques for time-domain spectral induced polarization”, Near Surface Geophysics 11 (2013) 91. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0217.1

M. Karous, & S. E. Hjelt, “Linear filtering of VLF dip-angle measurements”, Geophysical Prospecting 31 (1983) 782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01085.x

D. S. Parasnis, Principles of Applied Geophysics, Chapman Hall, London, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5814-2

I. A. Oyediran, & G. O. Adeyemi, “Geotechnical investigations of a site in Ajibode, Southwestern Nigeria for landfill”, Ozean Journal of Applied Sciences 4 (2011) 265. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2021.124022

Published

2023-11-04

How to Cite

Integrated geophysical assessment of a municipal waste disposal site for its geological suitability in terms of the underlain material. (2023). African Scientific Reports, 2(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.46481/asr.2023.2.3.92

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Integrated geophysical assessment of a municipal waste disposal site for its geological suitability in terms of the underlain material. (2023). African Scientific Reports, 2(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.46481/asr.2023.2.3.92